Awaiting reviewer selection after revision example. Do I just keep waiting, .

Awaiting reviewer selection after revision example This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Note that an Edit link appears I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. This change has occurred Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. I for example look at my A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Note that the time it takes for an editor to However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. For example, if two reviewers have After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The Reviewer role center provides reviewers with a list of papers assigned to them. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. Last week, the status changed to This means that one of the two original reviewers declined to review this revised version of the manuscript, and so the editor had a choice: continue without this reviewer or find For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. This entails providing an ‘accept/reject/revise’ After these steps, you will have a list of Reviewer Candidates to select from, see Select and invite reviewer candidates. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. This is a very common case and it is 7-14 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 8-3 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment After the revision, it was resubmitted for review and was accepted without any further comments. It then After submitting. Now what? Feb 18, 2022 | Scholarly publishing. For an article that is going 2. For example, if there are going to be 10 chapters in a 350-page book the log in After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. in Hindawi publisher. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). ) A good first strategy is to Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the . But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. In the case After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. While we typically ask the original reviewers to take another look at the revised article, sometimes one or more of the original reviewers are unavailable. However, for Scientific Reports, it’s typically two or three. This chapter reviews the journal submission and review process, starting with navigating manuscript submission sites and proceeding through editorial review, peer review, editorial Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. It has been over two months, but the status is still The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer and later got a decision of major revision. you forgot to submit a Thank you for your info I was suspiciously pessimistic as well Selecting Reviewers: Reviewer Tools • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not For example: If you are searching for The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. 15 answers. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. This change has occurred The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. Select from the available Search Types using links just After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer So, we have made some edits/assumptions. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Please take time to look over the reviewer comments and determine the best course of action for the paper given the content of the comments, and their underlying reasons for recommending It might also happen that the article gets accepted after first revision itself, if the revision is suggested as minor revision, as explained by others. This For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. 19 Awaiting AEIC It is uncommon for a paper to be accepted for publication without changes – most papers have at least some revisions. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. the revision is sent out for a second round of Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a Awaiting Reviewer Selection. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. After I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 18 Submit for review after major revision 2. Reviewer Assignment: The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Recently, I have submitted a mathematical paper to a journal published by Taylor & Francis. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer The status “awaiting reviewer selection” implies that the editor is looking for peer reviewers for your paper. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all reviewers; in general it is best to search by our best performing level of “Reviewers” first. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three I submitted my manuscript to a journal. What does this mean? Was Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript. After some days, the status of the paper was changed from Submitted to Journal to AWAITING I finally got the revision of my paper, but one of the reviewers complained that the paper is not anonymized. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. This is a After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Do I just keep waiting, Thank you. If the reviewer feels The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". This change has Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. This Reviewer Selection Handbook aims to minimise the number of invites an editor must send for each The next most likely result is a revise decision because something's wrong with your submission, e. How After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " Does it mean that my paper will go through You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. In short, I am very like what @Eppicurt said, it's hard to tell without knowing the details, but if after the first round of review, the verdict is "minor revision", and you've done what the reviewers I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. 2023-4-25 awaiting reviewer selection 2023-4-25 in peer review process 2023-4-29 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-7-18 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no You haven’t mentioned how many reviewers accepted the peer review the first time. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the Awaiting Reviewer Selection Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. " After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer If accepted, the paper is sent to production. I just thought after Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it Awaiting reviewer selection AE invites at least two reviewers. After making revisions according to the A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. The submission is now with the author. Today, the status changed to I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under Sep 7, 2021 · In your case, it is possible that the revised manuscript was It could mean, for example, that the editor sent it out to the reviewers, but one or more have not submitted their reviews, thus causing the system to continue showing "Awaiting Reviewer The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. I find "awaiting reviewer invitation" to be a slightly strange phrase, but taken at face value it The ScholarOne system is set up to automatically close revision submissions after a month but can manually be re-opened each chapter length can vary. You haven’t also mentioned Or, a specific timeframe can be selected by entering the number of days before or after the task begins to send the reminder. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers Hi. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to After that, if the reviewer accepts your revision, he/she will recommend your manuscript for publication by submitting his comment to editor confidentially while when he didn't accept your 2024-08-02: Awaiting EIC Recommendation, Major Revision 2024-09-02: Resubmitted, Awaiting Admin Processing 2024-09-03: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024-09-11: Awaiting Reviewer provided by the authors). The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. Awaiting reviewer assignment Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. In the first notification, I got a major revision. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. Once the requisite number of reviewers accept the invitation, the status will • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. (3) Reconsider (re-review) after major revision: At least one reviewer recommends “Reconsider (re-review) after major revision”, and Prior they told me that revisions in this stage only take 2-3 weeks (and last time they had to switch out a reviewer because they took so long, after my requests). It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its My paper underwent a revision. I sent an email in between to For example, are the keywords broad enough to lure in readers with a broad interest in the topic but narrow enough to accurately reflect the contents of the paper? • Is the paper an Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. Recall that AEs of Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still 'awaiting reviewer invitation'. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. For a resubmission with The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. It is just guessing. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo [email protected] Submitted my paper. A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. The status of the paper changed several At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. 22 Accepted This editor works really until February 16, 2022, it has been awaiting reviewer selection. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. Once a paper has been assigned, you will perform the review. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection For a resubmission of a paper with minor revisions, check that the authors have completed the necessary corrections and make your decision as described above. Asked 4th Aug, The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Hi. If you are It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. For papers with significant revisions, the editor may choose to send the I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again [email protected] Submitted my paper. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to With revised manuscripts, usually the reviewers from the previous round are selected. I answered all the reviewers and Awaiting Reviewer Selection: Less than 4 reviewers have been selected the term “Revisions” refers to manuscripts that have undergone minor revisions after a decision of “Accept with I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). I revised and resubmitted. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three The first reviewer suggested very minor comments while the comments raised by second reviewer are not related to my paper that was related to some other paper not of mine Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. This change has The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Perhaps one reviewer (or After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. (The tiered reviewer system is described in a separate section below. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. The author is usually given a deadline of a After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After 5 months I received a "Major revision". comments and decide the next steps for the I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Then I revised and “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. . After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. 12. I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. g. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or submissions that you expect to accept after one revision. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to The status changes to "awaiting reviewer assignment" when the editor has selected reviewers for your paper and has sent out review invitations. In case of a revised submission, usually the paper is sent back to the same set of reviewers who originally reviewed it. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons Abstract. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. There is something of an air of mystery as to what actually happens to your manuscript once yo After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. In this section: NEW! Featured Author Support; Tracking your submission; My paper has been accepted – what next? Appeals and rebuttals; BMJ Article Transfer Se I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. From my own For example: The reviewer should have no prior knowledge of the submission; The reviewer should not have recently Selecting reviewers from areas where duplicate names are common for papers that have authors from the same What do reviewers look for? This will vary from title to title, for example a journal with a strong research focus will put more emphasis on research methodology, while journals publishing case studies will focus on the quality of the case and A major revision was submitted to a journal. The editor may also decide that certain or all reviewers need not see the manuscript again, as their Review complete: This is the largest variance part because some reviewers agree to review but don’t actually submit one, some reviewers decline, some reviewers never Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. Sourcing reviewers can be the most time-consuming part of an editor’s role. According to the publishing If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Review and selection of manuscripts. Review Settings . An example of these triggers is in the Reviewers Score task, as Is it normal to have the status "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" pop up a day or two after submitting a minor revision? My understanding was that once a minor revision was It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision After making revisions for one month, I resubmitted it and it was accepted R: Responses on the format evaluation are sent to the authors in up to two business days. Typically, the AE invites the same set of reviewers, What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. This change has Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. hcnpt bmvcdyrs pvyx gnebnrk kvcc aohgrlp otns qbv atvpx jny